Slave被误写入数据如何恢复到主库

背景

在GreatSQL主从复制环境中，有时候可能会出现一些误操作，将本应该写入到主库的数据写入到了从库，导致主从数据不一致，影响数据同步。是否可以将写入从库的数据同步写入主库呢？

测试环境

角色	IP地址	数据库开放端口	版本
主库	192.168.137.179	3308	GreatSQL 8.0.32
从库	192.168.137.180	3308	GreatSQL 8.0.32

复制链路：

greatsql> show slave status\G;
*************************** 1. row ***************************Slave_IO_State: Waiting for source to send eventMaster_Host: 192.168.137.179Master_User: rootMaster_Port: 3308Connect_Retry: 60Master_Log_File: binlog.000001Read_Master_Log_Pos: 157Relay_Log_File: oracle_dts-relay-bin.000002Relay_Log_Pos: 367Relay_Master_Log_File: binlog.000001Slave_IO_Running: YesSlave_SQL_Running: Yes

表数据

主库

greatsql> select * from dept;
+--------+------------+----------+
| DEPTNO | DNAME      | LOC      |
+--------+------------+----------+
|     10 | ACCOUNTING | NEW YORK |
|     20 | RESEARCH   | DALLAS   |
|     30 | SALES      | CHICAGO  |
|     40 | OPERATIONS | BOSTON   |
|     60 | it         | 成都     |
+--------+------------+----------+
5 rows in set (0.00 sec)greatsql> insert into dept select 70,'IT','CTU';
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.01 sec)
Records: 1  Duplicates: 0  Warnings: 0greatsql> commit;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)

从库

greatsql> select * from dept;
+--------+------------+----------+
| DEPTNO | DNAME      | LOC      |
+--------+------------+----------+
|     10 | ACCOUNTING | NEW YORK |
|     20 | RESEARCH   | DALLAS   |
|     30 | SALES      | CHICAGO  |
|     40 | OPERATIONS | BOSTON   |
|     60 | it         | 成都     |
|     70 | IT         | CTU      |
+--------+------------+----------+
6 rows in set (0.00 sec)

主库写入的数据正常同步到从库

在从库写入数据

greatsql> insert into dept select 80,'IT','SZ';
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.01 sec)
Records: 1  Duplicates: 0  Warnings: 0greatsql> insert into dept select 90,'SALES','SZ';
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.01 sec)
Records: 1  Duplicates: 0  Warnings: 0

从库数据

greatsql> select * from dept;
+--------+------------+----------+
| DEPTNO | DNAME      | LOC      |
+--------+------------+----------+
|     10 | ACCOUNTING | NEW YORK |
|     20 | RESEARCH   | DALLAS   |
|     30 | SALES      | CHICAGO  |
|     40 | OPERATIONS | BOSTON   |
|     60 | it         | 成都     |
|     70 | IT         | CTU      |
|     80 | IT         | SZ       |
|     90 | SALES      | SZ       |
+--------+------------+----------+
8 rows in set (0.00 sec)

主库数据

greatsql> select * from dept;
+--------+------------+----------+
| DEPTNO | DNAME      | LOC      |
+--------+------------+----------+
|     10 | ACCOUNTING | NEW YORK |
|     20 | RESEARCH   | DALLAS   |
|     30 | SALES      | CHICAGO  |
|     40 | OPERATIONS | BOSTON   |
|     60 | it         | 成都     |
|     70 | IT         | CTU      |
+--------+------------+----------+
6 rows in set (0.01 sec)

此时从库写入的数据在主库中并没有出现

解析从库的二进制日志

$ mysqlbinlog -vv --base64-output=decode-rows  binlog.000002>b002.sqlBEGIN
/*!*/;#at 354
#240221 16:10:25 server id 18001  end_log_pos 416 CRC32 0xcc81584b      Table_map: `scott`.`dept` mapped to number 101
#has_generated_invisible_primary_key=0
#at 416
#240221 16:10:25 server id 18001  end_log_pos 462 CRC32 0x5149e38a      Write_rows: table id 101 flags:STMT_END_F###INSERT INTO `scott`.`dept`
###SET
###@1=80 /* INT meta=0 nullable=0 is_null=0 */
###@2='IT' /* VARSTRING(56) meta=56 nullable=1 is_null=0 */
###@3='SZ' /* VARSTRING(52) meta=52 nullable=1 is_null=0 */
#at 462
#240221 16:10:25 server id 18001  end_log_pos 493 CRC32 0xab795e4a      Xid = 34

可以看到写入的从库写入的数据在 binlog.000002，我们可以通过 grep 从库的 server id 确定日志文件中有没有在从库写入的数据。

复制从库日志到主库

$ scp binlog.000002  192.168.137.179:/tmp/
Warning: Permanently added '192.168.137.179' (ECDSA) to the list of known hosts.
root@192.168.137.179's password: 
binlog.000002                                                        100%  836     1.1MB/s   00:00 

应用从库的二进制日志

应用从库的日志到主库

$ mysqlbinlog binlog.000002|mysql -uroot -p -h127.1 -P3308

主库应用从库二进制日志时，从库二进制日志信息未发生变化

greatsql> show binary logs;
+---------------+-----------+-----------+
| Log_name      | File_size | Encrypted |
+---------------+-----------+-----------+
| binlog.000001 |       498 | No        |
| binlog.000002 |       836 | No        |
| binlog.000003 |       237 | No        |
+---------------+-----------+-----------+
3 rows in set (0.00 sec)

主从复制链路状态正常

greatsql> show slave status\G;
*************************** 1. row ***************************Slave_IO_State: Waiting for source to send eventMaster_Host: 192.168.137.179Master_User: rootMaster_Port: 3308Connect_Retry: 60Master_Log_File: binlog.000001Read_Master_Log_Pos: 1059Relay_Log_File: oracle_dts-relay-bin.000002Relay_Log_Pos: 1269Relay_Master_Log_File: binlog.000001Slave_IO_Running: YesSlave_SQL_Running: Yes

可以看到主库在应用从库产生的二进制日志时，从库没有重复应用这些二进制日志(By default, the replication I/O (receiver) thread does not write binary log events to the relay log if they have the replica's server ID (this optimization helps save disk usage). )，出现主键冲突，导致复制状态出错

查看主库数据

greatsql> select * from dept;
+--------+------------+----------+
| DEPTNO | DNAME      | LOC      |
+--------+------------+----------+
|     10 | ACCOUNTING | NEW YORK |
|     20 | RESEARCH   | DALLAS   |
|     30 | SALES      | CHICAGO  |
|     40 | OPERATIONS | BOSTON   |
|     60 | it         | 成都     |
|     70 | IT         | CTU      |
|     80 | IT         | SZ       |
|     90 | SALES      | SZ       |
+--------+------------+----------+
8 rows in set (0.00 sec)

后续测试，主库写入数据可正常同步到从库。

---

Enjoy GreatSQL :)

关于 GreatSQL

GreatSQL是适用于金融级应用的国内自主开源数据库，具备高性能、高可靠、高易用性、高安全等多个核心特性，可以作为MySQL或Percona Server的可选替换，用于线上生产环境，且完全免费并兼容MySQL或Percona Server。

相关链接： GreatSQL社区 Gitee GitHub Bilibili

GreatSQL社区：

社区有奖建议反馈： https://greatsql.cn/thread-54-1-1.html

社区博客有奖征稿详情： https://greatsql.cn/thread-100-1-1.html

（对文章有疑问或者有独到见解都可以去社区官网提出或分享哦~）

技术交流群：

微信&QQ群：

QQ群：533341697

微信群：添加GreatSQL社区助手（微信号：wanlidbc ）好友，待社区助手拉您进群。